Compare and Contrast: Loewes Fall 2009

Ad Campaign , Amber Valleta , Gisele Bundchen , Inez and Vinoodh , Steven Klein 2 comments

To demonstrate the stark contrast and the severity of their differences, let us start with the Spring 2009 ads featuring Amber Valleta and boy candys including Garrett Neff, photographed by Steven Klein.

And for fall 2009, photographed by Inez Van Lamsweerde and Vinoodh Matadin. Seriously, Inez and Vinoodh? Are you sure? Pretty Sure. And I am also pretty sure that is the highest paid, pregnant supermodel, Gisele Bundchen. I guess Gisele is so expensive that they couldn’t afford to spare any money for the set or male models.

At least they have a cat.

Wait, is that even a real cat? Photoshop or stuffed?

These are the best quality I can find at the moment.

2 comments :

Kasia said...: Is that Gisele or Kate Blanchett? They look really similar to me in that second picture.
Wow, last season's campaign was so much better - it looked like a Vogue Paris spread. This just looks really odd. Haha! I mean, what is she doing with her arms? That looks really uncomfortable, and it looks like she's sitting on a miniature bed frame, and that cat really looks photoshopped - not to mention the bags look very cheap to me. God, I'm usually not so critical - I can't stand critical people, but I just can't help it! What happened to creativity - and taking risks? Has the economy really affected the fashion world this seriously?; June 22, 2009 at 11:37 AM
Jessie said...: The poses look a little too forced. Not a fan.; June 22, 2009 at 5:40 PM

Subscribe to: Post Comments ( Atom )